MARCH 19
1968•Gold-Cover Requirement Removed From Paper Currency
2015•Native American $1 Products
America Removes the Gold-Cover Requirement From Its Paper Currency
On March 19, 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed legislation eliminating the remaining statutory gold-reserve requirements behind Federal Reserve notes, United States notes and Treasury notes of 1890. For decades, federal law had required gold reserves equal to at least 25 percent of Federal Reserve notes in circulation. By 1968, that rule was locking up most of America's shrinking gold stock at precisely the moment the government needed gold to defend the dollar internationally. Removing the “gold cover” did not immediately end the dollar's international link to gold—that would come later—but it severed one of the last legal ties between America's domestic paper currency and a mandatory gold reserve.
◆
A Law About the Money in Americans' Pockets
The change concerned something almost everyone used but few people thought about: paper money.
Federal Reserve notes had become the dominant form of U.S. currency.
Yet behind those notes remained an old statutory requirement inherited from the gold-standard era.
Each Federal Reserve Bank had to maintain gold-certificate reserves equal to at least 25 percent of its Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation.
The requirement did not mean that every dollar bill contained gold or that an ordinary American in 1968 could walk into a bank and redeem four dollars for one dollar's worth of gold.
Domestic redemption of paper currency in monetary gold had already disappeared decades earlier.
The 25 percent rule was a reserve requirement imposed on the Federal Reserve System.
When the Federal Reserve System was created in 1913, gold remained central to American money.
Federal Reserve notes were introduced within a system that still treated gold reserves as an important restraint and source of confidence.
The world of 1968 was radically different.
Under the original Federal Reserve framework, Reserve Banks faced a 40 percent gold-reserve requirement against Federal Reserve notes.
That reflected the monetary assumptions of the early twentieth century.
Gold was not merely an investment commodity.
It was part of the operating architecture of money.
The banking crises of the early 1930s placed extraordinary pressure on the American monetary system.
Depositors sought cash.
Gold flowed out of banks.
Confidence collapsed.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt entered office in March 1933, the administration moved rapidly to restrict gold movements and stabilize the banking system.
1933 and the End of Domestic Gold Coin Circulation
Roosevelt's gold policies removed gold coin from ordinary domestic monetary use.
Most private monetary gold holdings were required to be surrendered under federal rules, subject to exemptions.
The traditional American practice of using gold coins such as eagles and double eagles as ordinary money effectively ended.
The Philadelphia Mint struck 445,500 Saint-Gaudens double eagles dated 1933.
They were not released into normal circulation.
Nearly all were later destroyed.
The famous rarity is therefore a physical artifact of the same transformation that ultimately led to the 1968 gold-cover repeal.
The Gold Reserve Act centralized monetary gold in the federal government and fundamentally reorganized the country's gold system.
The official value of gold was subsequently established at $35 per troy ounce.
Domestic Americans no longer operated under the old gold-coin standard, but gold remained enormously important internationally.
After World War II, the Bretton Woods monetary system placed the dollar at the center of international finance.
Other major currencies were linked to the dollar.
The United States maintained official gold convertibility for eligible foreign monetary authorities at $35 per ounce.
By the 1960s, it is useful to separate two concepts.
Domestic gold cover was the statutory reserve behind certain U.S. paper currency.
International gold convertibility was the United States' commitment to exchange dollars held by qualified foreign official institutions for gold at the official price.
They were related, but they were not the same thing.
This distinction is essential.
Removing the 25 percent gold cover did not mean that the United States abandoned the $35 international gold commitment on March 19, 1968.
In fact, one argument for repealing the cover was that doing so would free more American gold to defend that international commitment.
After World War II, the United States possessed an enormous share of the world's monetary gold.
Over subsequent decades, dollars accumulated overseas.
Foreign governments and central banks could potentially exchange eligible dollar holdings for U.S. gold.
American gold reserves declined.
The postwar system contained a structural tension.
The world needed dollars for trade and reserves.
Supplying those dollars meant increasing foreign dollar claims.
But confidence in dollar-gold convertibility depended on confidence that the United States possessed enough gold to honor those claims.
Economist Robert Triffin famously identified this contradiction.
The reserve-currency country had to supply liquidity to the world, yet doing so could eventually undermine confidence in the reserve currency's gold convertibility.
By the 1960s, this was no longer merely theoretical.
The Gold Cover Locked Up Gold Domestically
At the beginning of 1968, the United States had roughly $12 billion in monetary gold.
About $10.7 billion was effectively required as statutory backing for Federal Reserve notes and certain other currency.
That left only about $1.3 billion in “free gold” above the domestic cover requirement.
Federal Reserve notes in circulation were increasing by roughly $2 billion per year.
Under a 25 percent gold-cover rule, an additional $2 billion of notes required approximately another $500 million in gold reserves.
Normal economic growth therefore kept locking up more gold.
The government wanted gold available to support international confidence in the dollar.
Yet domestic law required increasing amounts of that gold to sit behind paper notes that Americans could no longer redeem in gold.
The old safeguard was interfering with the new monetary system.
President Lyndon Johnson urged Congress to remove the gold-cover requirement.
Treasury Secretary Henry H. Fowler and Federal Reserve Chairman William McChesney Martin Jr. supported the change.
The administration described the requirement as obsolete.
Quite the opposite.
Administration officials argued that gold mattered so much internationally that it should not be immobilized by an outdated domestic reserve rule.
The country's entire gold stock should be available to support the international dollar.
In early 1968, the House Committee on Banking and Currency held hearings on H.R. 14743.
The bill proposed eliminating reserve requirements for Federal Reserve notes, United States notes and Treasury notes of 1890.
The hearings captured a monetary system in transition.
Federal Reserve Chairman Martin told Congress that even without further foreign gold purchases, normal growth in currency circulation would consume the remaining free gold in a relatively short time.
The requirement would eventually have to be changed.
Existing law provided mechanisms for temporary suspension.
But officials argued that repeatedly suspending an obsolete requirement made little sense.
A permanent statutory change was cleaner and more credible.
The gold-cover ratio had previously been lowered from 40 percent to 25 percent in 1945.
That earlier reduction recognized the growing demands placed on the monetary system.
By 1968, policymakers concluded that even 25 percent no longer served a useful purpose.
In 1965, Congress eliminated the statutory gold-reserve requirement against Federal Reserve Bank deposit liabilities.
The 1968 action removed the remaining minimum gold reserve against Federal Reserve notes.
The process therefore unfolded in stages.
Federal Reserve Notes Still Needed Collateral
Removing the statutory gold reserve did not mean Federal Reserve notes became unsupported scraps of paper.
Reserve Banks still had to pledge legally eligible collateral against notes.
The change removed the mandatory minimum gold component.
This distinction often disappears in casual discussions of paper money.
A currency can lack a fixed gold reserve requirement while still being issued against assets under a legal and institutional framework.
The 1968 law changed the type of constraint, not the existence of monetary institutions.
Supporters of repeal argued that the dollar's strength ultimately rested on the productive capacity and credibility of the United States economy, not on an arbitrary statutory ratio between paper notes and gold certificates.
That represented a profound change from nineteenth-century monetary thinking.
Not everyone regarded gold cover as meaningless.
Critics viewed a statutory metallic reserve as discipline.
Removing it, they feared, weakened a barrier against excessive currency creation and inflation.
American monetary history is filled with arguments over what should restrain money creation.
Gold.
Silver.
Bank reserves.
Central-bank policy.
Legislative rules.
The 1968 debate belonged to that much older argument.
The Coinage Act of 1792 established a bimetallic monetary system based on gold and silver.
For much of American history, precious metal was not merely symbolic backing.
It was the substance of high-value money itself.
Bank notes, United States notes, gold certificates, silver certificates and Federal Reserve notes created increasingly complex layers of paper currency.
Over time, the direct relationship between the paper in a wallet and a specific quantity of precious metal weakened.
The repeal removed the requirement that a fixed percentage of circulating Federal Reserve notes be matched by gold-certificate reserves.
For domestic paper currency, the old gold-standard architecture had largely reached its end.
The timing could hardly have been more dramatic.
Gold markets were under severe pressure in March 1968.
Demand for gold surged.
The international arrangements used to stabilize the market were breaking down.
During the 1960s, the United States and several European countries cooperated through the London Gold Pool to help maintain the official $35 gold price in the London market.
Participating central banks supplied or absorbed gold as needed.
Speculative demand intensified as confidence in the fixed price weakened.
Maintaining the market required increasing official gold sales.
By March 1968, the system could no longer continue in its existing form.
The Two-Tier Gold Market
During the weekend of March 16–17, major monetary authorities moved toward a two-tier system.
Official monetary transactions would continue at the official price while private gold would trade at market prices.
This was another sign that the postwar gold system was under extraordinary strain.
That is why the March 1968 legislation cannot be understood as an isolated technical amendment.
It occurred while the international monetary system itself was visibly destabilizing.
The enrolled law, Public Law 90-269, is printed in the Statutes at Large as approved March 18, 1968.
A contemporary Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond review states that President Johnson signed the bill on March 19, 1968.
The audited CoinCrafters calendar uses March 19 as the presidential-signing milestone.
Because authoritative historical sources preserve this one-day discrepancy, it should be disclosed rather than concealed.
The legislation amended or repealed multiple provisions accumulated across decades of monetary law.
Its central effect was elimination of mandatory gold reserves for Federal Reserve notes and remaining reserve requirements associated with United States notes and Treasury notes of 1890.
United States notes—often called Legal Tender notes or, historically, “greenbacks”—originated during the Civil War.
Although they represented a small part of the money supply by 1968, old statutory reserve provisions still survived.
Treasury notes issued under the Sherman Silver Purchase Act represented another relic of an earlier monetary era.
By 1968, the legislation was cleaning obsolete provisions from a system that had accumulated layers of gold, silver and paper-money law for generations.
At first glance, a law about Federal Reserve notes may seem far removed from numismatics.
It is not.
The history of American coins cannot be separated from the monetary system those coins served.
A Saint-Gaudens double eagle was not originally created as a collectible bullion piece.
It was twenty dollars.
Its gold content was integral to its monetary role.
The disappearance of circulating gold coins reflects the same century-long transformation that culminated in laws such as the 1968 repeal.
Only a few years before the gold-cover repeal, the Coinage Act of 1965 had removed silver from the dime and quarter and reduced the silver content of the half dollar.
Precious metal was disappearing from everyday American money in both coin and paper-reserve systems.
1964 Was the Last Year of 90 Percent Circulating Silver
Rising silver prices and coin shortages forced Congress to reconsider traditional metallic coinage.
Copper-nickel clad coins replaced silver dimes and quarters.
The Kennedy half dollar shifted first to 40 percent silver and later to base-metal clad composition.
Gold coins disappeared from circulation.
Silver disappeared from most circulating denominations.
Silver certificates lost their redemption function.
The gold cover behind paper notes disappeared.
American money was becoming decisively fiduciary rather than metallic.
The irony is important.
Americans could not redeem their dollars for gold domestically.
Foreign official holders still could under the Bretton Woods framework.
That asymmetry became increasingly difficult to sustain.
On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced suspension of dollar convertibility into gold for foreign monetary authorities.
The “gold window” closed.
The action effectively ended the central gold-convertibility mechanism of Bretton Woods.
The March 1968 law did not cause Nixon's decision three years later.
But both events belong to the same unraveling monetary structure.
The government was progressively removing constraints that no longer fit economic and international realities.
At the end of 1974, restrictions on private American ownership of monetary gold were lifted.
That produced another historical reversal.
Americans could once again legally own bullion gold broadly, even though the dollar itself was no longer redeemable in gold.
For most Americans today, gold is an investment, commodity, jewelry material or collectible.
It is not the substance into which ordinary paper dollars are redeemable.
The events of 1933–1974 created that modern relationship.
Modern American gold coins returned in forms such as commemoratives and American Eagle bullion coins.
But these are not a restoration of circulating gold money.
Their face values are nominal relative to their metal and market values.
Both are legal-tender coins.
But their monetary roles are entirely different.
The older coin existed within a monetary system where gold coinage itself served as money.
The modern bullion coin exists in a fiat-dollar system.
Without understanding the system, denominations can be misleading.
A $20 gold piece, a $1 silver certificate and a modern $50 Gold Eagle all say dollar amounts.
But the relationship between face value, metal and redemption differs enormously.
That common phrase is too simplistic.
The law removed a statutory minimum gold-reserve requirement.
Federal Reserve notes continued to be obligations of the United States and continued to require collateral under federal law.
The monetary system shifted away from metallic reserve ratios, not away from legal and institutional backing altogether.
Nor Did the Government Empty Fort Knox
Removing the gold cover did not mean America's gold stock disappeared.
The Treasury continued to own enormous gold reserves.
Fort Knox, West Point and Denver continued to hold federal gold.
The change concerned the legal function assigned to that gold.
That was the administration's immediate argument.
Instead of reserving most Treasury gold to satisfy a domestic accounting ratio, policymakers wanted the full stock available to defend the dollar's international position.
Removing the cover freed gold from the domestic requirement.
It did not solve the fundamental imbalance between growing foreign dollar holdings and finite American gold reserves.
That deeper problem survived.
The 1971 suspension of convertibility demonstrated that the international gold commitment could not be preserved indefinitely under existing conditions.
The world eventually moved toward floating exchange rates among major currencies.
It sits between two monetary worlds.
The United States had already abandoned domestic gold redemption.
It had not yet abandoned international gold convertibility.
The gold-cover repeal removed a domestic relic in an attempt to preserve the international system.
The Bretton Woods gold link ended.
The 25 percent domestic gold-cover requirement did not return.
Modern Federal Reserve notes are not constrained by a statutory rule requiring gold equal to one-quarter of their value.
The event may lack the visual drama of a new coin striking.
No new portrait appeared.
No commemorative went on sale.
Yet the law altered the monetary foundation beneath every Federal Reserve note in circulation.
For centuries, societies tried to anchor money to precious metal.
By 1968, the United States was increasingly relying instead on central banking, fiscal institutions, legal tender and confidence in the productive economy.
The gold-cover repeal made that transformation explicit.
On March 19, 1968, President Lyndon Johnson signed legislation eliminating the remaining statutory gold-cover requirements behind America's paper currency. The old rule had required gold reserves equal to at least 25 percent of Federal Reserve notes in circulation, tying up roughly $10.7 billion of a $12 billion U.S. gold stock. Repeal freed that gold for international monetary purposes, but it did not end the dollar's foreign convertibility into gold. That final break came in 1971. The 1968 law instead marked a crucial middle step: one of the last legal remnants of America's domestic gold-standard system disappeared while the government was still struggling to save the international one.
ALSO ON THIS DAY
2015 — Native American $1 Products — The Mint opened sales for 2015 Native American $1 Coin rolls, bags and boxes.