Congress Authorizes the Grant Memorial Half Dollar and Gold Dollar

When President Warren G. Harding approved Public Law 67-137 on February 2, 1922, the United States committed to producing an unusual two-denomination commemorative program for one of the most important figures of the nineteenth century.

The legislation authorized as many as 10,000 Grant Memorial gold dollars and 250,000 Grant Memorial silver half dollars. Both were intended to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Ulysses S. Grant, the Union general who led the United States Army to victory in the Civil War and later served two terms as president.

But the coins were not authorized simply as souvenirs.

Congress specified that the program was intended to help finance memorial projects in Ohio associated with Grant’s life: community buildings in Georgetown and Bethel, and a five-mile highway from New Richmond to Point Pleasant, Grant’s birthplace. The proposed road was to be known as the Grant Memorial Road.

For coin collectors, the February 2 legislation created something even more enduring. The resulting 1922 Grant coins became part of the colorful—and sometimes controversial—classic United States commemorative series.

Remembering Ulysses S. Grant at 100

Ulysses S. Grant was born on April 27, 1822, at Point Pleasant, Ohio. By the time of the Civil War, he had emerged from relative obscurity to become the Union’s most successful military commander. President Abraham Lincoln promoted him to lieutenant general in 1864 and placed him in command of the Union armies.

Grant’s military reputation rested on a series of victories that transformed the course of the war, including Fort Donelson, Vicksburg and Chattanooga. His relentless campaigns against Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia eventually led to Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House in April 1865.

Grant later became the 18th president of the United States, serving from 1869 to 1877.

As the centennial of his birth approached, organizers in Ohio sought a national commemoration. The Ulysses S. Grant Centenary Association promoted celebrations and permanent memorial projects connected with the communities where Grant had been born and raised.

Commemorative coins offered a way to combine national recognition with fundraising.

The February 2, 1922 Law

The act approved on February 2 was explicit about both the purpose and scale of the program.

Congress authorized the United States mints to produce up to 10,000 Grant Memorial gold dollars and 250,000 Grant Memorial silver half dollars. The coins were to be legal tender and were to commemorate the centenary of Grant’s birth.

The legislation also specified where the proceeds were intended to help.

One proposed community building would stand in Georgetown, Brown County, Ohio, where Grant spent much of his youth. Another was planned for Bethel in Clermont County. The program was also intended to assist construction of the Grant Memorial Road, running from New Richmond to Point Pleasant.

Congress protected the federal government from some of the program’s costs by providing that the United States would not bear the expense of preparing the necessary dies and other coinage preparations.

This structure was typical of the classic commemorative era. Congress authorized special coins, but sponsoring organizations purchased and marketed them above face value in hopes of generating money for memorials, expositions, anniversaries or civic projects.

Two Denominations, One Design

The Grant program was unusual because it paired a silver half dollar with a gold dollar bearing essentially the same design.

The artist responsible for both sides was Laura Gardin Fraser, one of the most important women in American numismatic art.

Fraser was already an accomplished sculptor and medalist. She had designed the 1921 Alabama Centennial half dollar and would go on to produce other significant medallic and coin designs. Her husband, James Earle Fraser, was the sculptor responsible for the famous Buffalo nickel.

For the Grant coins, Laura Gardin Fraser placed a strong profile portrait of Grant on the obverse. The dates 1822–1922 identify the centennial being celebrated.

The reverse depicts a log cabin associated with Grant’s birthplace in Point Pleasant, Ohio, surrounded by trees. The imagery tied the nationally famous general and president back to his Ohio origins.

The same basic artwork appeared on both the gold dollar and silver half dollar, creating a visually unified commemorative program across two very different coin sizes and metals.

Then the program acquired the feature that would make it particularly memorable to collectors.

Some Grant coins were struck with a small star in the obverse field near Grant’s name. Others were struck without it.

The star did not represent a military rank, battle honor, state, mint or official element of Grant symbolism. Numismatic references agree that it served essentially to create an additional variety that could be marketed to collectors.

This was not entirely unprecedented. Other commemorative programs of the period had discovered that small design differences could encourage collectors to purchase more than one version of what was otherwise the same issue.

With the Grant program, the strategy produced four principal collectible combinations: gold dollar with star, gold dollar without star, half dollar with star, and half dollar without star.

The maneuver was controversial even at the time. Collectors understood that the variants were being manufactured deliberately to stimulate additional sales.

That controversy is now part of what makes the Grant commemoratives such revealing artifacts of the early commemorative-coin market.

The Gold Dollar

The 1922 Grant Memorial gold dollar was struck at the Philadelphia Mint and carried no mint mark.

The authorized maximum was 10,000 pieces. The issue was divided into star and no-star versions, with approximately 5,000 of each produced for distribution, apart from assay accounting.

The United States Mint identifies Laura Gardin Fraser as the designer of both the obverse and reverse. Grant’s portrait dominates the obverse, while the cabin scene appears on the reverse.

The star variety placed the small additional symbol in the obverse field. The basic design otherwise remained the same.

Contemporary buyers paid substantially more than the coin’s one-dollar face value. Specialist records place the original price of the plain gold dollar at $3, while the star version was offered at $3.50.

Because the coins were marketed primarily as collectibles, most surviving examples were preserved rather than spent. As a result, Grant gold dollars are commonly encountered in Mint State relative to many circulating gold issues of the period.

The Grant Memorial half dollar used the same portrait-and-cabin concept on a larger silver planchet.

Congress had authorized as many as 250,000 half dollars, but actual collector demand fell well short of that ceiling.

Specialist records show that 95,055 pieces were struck including assay coins, with 27,650 later melted. The number ultimately distributed was therefore far below the quarter-million maximum permitted by Congress.

The most important collector distinction is again the star.

Only a small portion of the Grant half dollars carried it. The star half dollar became dramatically scarcer than the ordinary no-star issue, and today it is one of the key varieties in the classic commemorative series.

That scarcity has also created a danger for collectors. Because a genuine star half dollar can be substantially more valuable than its plain counterpart, altered coins have appeared with false stars added to otherwise genuine no-star Grant halves.

NGC has documented examples of this alteration and advises collectors to pay close attention to the shape, position and surrounding metal of the star when evaluating uncertified pieces.

A Coin Variety Created for Collectors

The Grant star is especially interesting because it demonstrates how quickly the commemorative coin market had become sophisticated.

These coins were legal tender, but their primary purpose was not ordinary commerce. They were fundraising objects sold to a public interested in history, patriotism and coin collecting.

Sponsors understood that collectors wanted complete sets. If an issue existed in two recognizable forms, a collector might feel compelled to buy both.

Multiply that idea across two denominations and the Grant program could effectively offer four collectibles instead of two.

The tactic generated criticism because it blurred the line between legitimate numismatic variety and artificially manufactured scarcity. That debate would continue throughout the classic commemorative era as Congress authorized an increasing number of coins for local anniversaries and fundraising campaigns.

In that sense, the Grant coins tell two histories at once: the history they were created to commemorate, and the history of the commemorative coin business itself.

The Grant issue also deserves attention because of its designer.

Laura Gardin Fraser built a distinguished career in sculpture and medallic art at a time when major federal commissions were still overwhelmingly awarded to men.

Her Grant portrait is direct and dignified. Rather than surrounding the subject with elaborate allegory, she paired Grant’s profile with the modest Ohio cabin on the reverse. The contrast is effective: one side shows the nationally recognized military and political figure, while the other points back to his beginnings.

Fraser’s numismatic legacy extends well beyond the Grant coins. Her work has attracted renewed attention in modern American coinage, particularly because of her proposed portrait of George Washington for the quarter competition of the early 1930s. Although John Flanagan’s design was ultimately adopted for the circulating Washington quarter, Fraser’s Washington portrait survived in the artistic record and was eventually revived by the United States Mint generations later.

The 1922 Grant coins therefore belong to the career of an artist whose influence reaches from the classic commemorative period into modern United States coinage.

The Classic Commemorative Era

The Grant issue came during the first great period of American commemorative coinage.

Beginning with the Columbian half dollars of 1892 and 1893, Congress increasingly authorized coins connected with expositions, anniversaries, monuments and local historical events. Sponsoring organizations generally purchased the coins from the government at face value and sold them to collectors at a premium.

The system could work well when public interest was strong. But it also created incentives to produce extra varieties, distribute coins through favored channels or seek authorization for events whose national importance was sometimes debatable.

By the 1920s and 1930s, collector frustration with proliferating commemorative issues became an important part of the series’ history.

The Grant star varieties are an early and especially clear example of that tension.

Today, however, the very feature that irritated some contemporary collectors has become one of the reasons the issue is studied so closely.

The February 2 legislation is also a reminder that classic commemorative coins were often conceived as financial tools rather than simply governmental honors.

The Grant coins were supposed to help raise money for physical memorials and transportation improvements in Ohio. Their value to the sponsoring organization came from the difference between the coins’ face value and the premium collectors were willing to pay.

A half dollar sold for more than fifty cents generated money for the project. A one-dollar gold coin sold for three dollars or more could do the same.

This explains why marketing mattered so much—and why creating additional collectible varieties could be tempting.

Congress supplied the authorization and the United States Mint supplied the coinage. But success depended on convincing the public to purchase the pieces as souvenirs and collectibles.

Why February 2 Matters

February 2, 1922 is not the date the Grant coins were struck or released. It is the date Congress gave the program legal existence.

That distinction is important in a calendar of American coin history.

Before the act became law, the proposed Grant half dollar and gold dollar were ideas. After February 2, the United States Mint had congressional authority to turn those ideas into legal-tender commemorative coins.

The law defined the denominations, maximum quantities, commemorative purpose and fundraising goals. The design work, production, marketing and collector controversy followed from that authorization.

For modern collectors, the result is a compact but remarkably rich series: two denominations, one distinguished sculptor, a Civil War general and president, an Ohio memorial campaign, and a tiny star that transformed an otherwise straightforward centennial issue into a lasting numismatic puzzle.

The Grant Memorial coins were created to celebrate a man whose life had become inseparable from the history of the Civil War and Reconstruction-era America.

Yet the coins themselves became historical documents in their own right.

They preserve Laura Gardin Fraser’s portraiture. They illustrate the fundraising structure of early commemorative coin programs. Their star varieties reveal the increasingly commercial relationship between sponsors and collectors. And their uneven distribution shows the difference between the enormous quantities Congress sometimes authorized and the much smaller number the market would actually absorb.

All of that history traces back to one piece of legislation.

On February 2, 1922, Congress authorized the Grant Memorial gold dollar and silver half dollar, launching one of the classic commemorative era’s most distinctive two-denomination programs.

---

ALSO ON THIS DAY

2026 — Polly Cooper Native American Dollar Announced — The U.S. Mint announced rolls and bags for the 2026 Native American $1 honoring Polly Cooper and the Oneida Indian Nation.

Related Coin History

• Congress Shuts Down the Classic U.S. Commemorative Coin Boom
• One Law Creates Three Classic American Commemorative Half Dollars
• The Oregon Trail Memorial Half Dollar Is Authorized
• The Hawaiian Half Dollar Breaks a U.S. Coinage Tradition